Philipp Petzschner
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 29, 2013 | H2H |
| Janko Tipsarevic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 1, 2012 | H2H |
| Lukas Lacko | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Florian Mayer | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 28, 2012 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Philipp Petzschner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6(6) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michal Przysiezny | 6-3 7-6(6) 6-0 | Philipp Petzschner | Match data | Jun 26, 2013* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 86 | 105 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,346 | #57 | 810 | 1,783 | 19 | 59 | 24.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #115 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #174 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2003 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2004 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2010 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 2011 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2013 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 30 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 51 | 61 | 112 | 45.5% | 14 | 25 | 39 | 35.9% | 21 | 19 | 40 | 52.5% | — | 11 | 33 | 44 | 25.0% | 4 | 18 | 22 | 18.2% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 188/191 of Philipp Petzschner's and 78/78 of Michal Przysiezny's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2003 | 5/5 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 49.2% | 79.2% | 47.6% | 61.6% | 22.1% | 63.6% | 28.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 2/2 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 58.1% | 59.2% | 54.4% | 41.4% | 41.7% | 57.7% | 33.2% | 2004 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 57.9% | 68.1% | 40.4% | 47.8% | 65.0% | 56.8% | 33.7% |
| 21 | 2005 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 54.0% | 64.8% | 61.3% | 64.6% | 15.5% | 63.0% | 34.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 56.7% | 61.0% | 53.4% | 47.7% | 33.8% | 57.3% | 42.3% |
| 23 | 2007 | 2/2 | 16.0 | 5.5 | 53.9% | 75.2% | 49.8% | 50.5% | 29.9% | 63.4% | 36.6% | 2007 | 4/4 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 59.0% | 68.4% | 40.8% | 60.0% | 34.4% | 56.7% | 36.4% |
| 24 | 2008 | 19/19 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 55.4% | 75.0% | 52.5% | 53.7% | 34.3% | 64.6% | 37.2% | 2008 | 3/3 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 57.2% | 63.7% | 44.9% | 52.2% | 9.5% | 55.6% | 28.6% |
| 25 | 2009 | 40/40 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 73.5% | 46.1% | 58.1% | 44.4% | 61.1% | 32.5% | 2009 | 1/1 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 59.4% | 71.9% | 56.4% | 57.1% | 66.7% | 65.6% | 27.8% |
| 26 | 2010 | 40/40 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 73.8% | 48.7% | 58.7% | 42.2% | 62.7% | 36.7% | 2010 | 13/13 | 7.8 | 4.9 | 55.7% | 72.2% | 44.7% | 54.0% | 43.2% | 60.4% | 27.7% |
| 27 | 2011 | 43/43 | 7.3 | 3.0 | 54.3% | 75.2% | 52.5% | 59.2% | 37.6% | 64.7% | 36.1% | 2011 | 5/5 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 54.2% | 71.1% | 53.3% | 49.0% | 35.0% | 63.1% | 35.6% |
| 28 | 2012 | 24/27 | 7.1 | 2.4 | 60.3% | 72.1% | 48.8% | 53.6% | 46.1% | 62.9% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 8/8 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 58.6% | 69.1% | 50.2% | 42.7% | 36.9% | 61.0% | 36.9% | 2013 | 21/21 | 8.5 | 3.2 | 59.7% | 76.4% | 50.5% | 60.5% | 45.2% | 65.7% | 31.2% |
| 30 | 2014 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 54.9% | 75.6% | 43.0% | 62.0% | 27.8% | 60.9% | 33.2% | 2014 | 22/22 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 60.0% | 70.5% | 47.5% | 54.6% | 36.5% | 61.3% | 31.4% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2/2 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 52.0% | 73.6% | 44.1% | 47.9% | 15.0% | 59.2% | 29.5% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 48.8% | 79.5% | 43.9% | 75.0% | 33.3% | 61.3% | 29.0% |
| Career | — | 188/191 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 55.6% | 73.7% | 49.6% | 56.7% | 39.9% | 62.9% | 35.2% | — | 78/78 | 7.4 | 3.6 | 58.1% | 71.7% | 47.9% | 55.5% | 39.1% | 61.7% | 31.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1517 | 106.4 | +0.99 | -1.83 | 0.781 | 45.5% | +35 | — | — | 55.6% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1526 | 102.9 | -1.72 | +0.68 | 0.784 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.10 | 2004 | 1478 | 104.1 | -0.13 | -2.62 | 0.778 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1506 | 97.1 | -2.68 | -0.82 | 0.933 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1507 | 110.8 | +0.85 | -1.37 | 0.993 | 50.1% | — | +39 | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1562 | 113.3 | -1.03 | +2.89 | 1.001 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.56 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.08 | 2007 | 1541 | 111.9 | -0.66 | -0.96 | 0.841 | 47.0% | — | +24 | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.33 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1737 | 124.8 | +0.66 | -0.08 | 1.051 | 50.3% | +2 | -228 | -124 | 48.9% | -0.26 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 104.6 | -0.39 | 2008 | 1514 | 102.9 | -0.59 | -3.68 | 0.644 | 43.1% | — | +58 | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.18 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1697 | 141.6 | -1.23 | -2.33 | 0.836 | 47.2% | -18 | -153 | -10 | 41.7% | -0.66 | 7–10 (41%) | 16–8 (67%) | 105.4 | -1.29 | 2009 | 1517 | 108.0 | +0.26 | -4.12 | 0.808 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.10 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1761 | 142.7 | -0.25 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -39 | -166 | +41 | 50.5% | +0.09 | 11–6 (65%) | 9–8 (53%) | 108.1 | -0.05 | 2010 | 1431 | 114.5 | -2.53 | -4.94 | 0.699 | 45.0% | +3 | +75 | +146 | 24.2% | -1.30 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–7 (13%) | 91.5 | -0.12 |
| 27 | 2011 | 1764 | 141.8 | +1.01 | -0.25 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -35 | -153 | +86 | 50.0% | +0.14 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–12 (48%) | 101.4 | -1.80 | 2011 | 1440 | 111.8 | -1.03 | -2.02 | 0.965 | 50.0% | +12 | — | — | 30.8% | -0.61 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.44 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1698 | 130.8 | -0.80 | -0.33 | 0.955 | 49.4% | -26 | — | +191 | 45.5% | -0.09 | 1–4 (20%) | 5–6 (45%) | 94.9 | +0.15 | 2012 | 1489 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 1654 | 120.4 | -1.50 | +0.42 | 0.947 | 48.5% | +41 | — | — | 41.2% | -1.12 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.81 | 2013 | 1776 | 134.8 | +1.94 | -2.48 | 0.909 | 49.2% | -91 | — | -65 | 43.6% | -0.42 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–6 (45%) | 105.3 | +0.18 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1653 | 110.6 | -1.72 | -1.30 | 0.851 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -1.75 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.19 | 2014 | 1660 | 121.7 | -1.71 | -4.21 | 0.811 | 46.8% | +17 | -131 | -26 | 31.0% | -1.26 | 3–6 (33%) | 8–7 (53%) | 97.5 | +0.21 |
| 31 | 2015 | 1603 | 109.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1668 | 119.8 | -0.92 | -3.23 | 0.723 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1656 | 105.5 | -4.72 | -0.33 | 0.748 | 46.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 34 | 2018 | 1582 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1633 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1847 | 138.0 | -0.24 | -0.53 | 0.950 | 49.1% | -21 | -169 | +61 | 46.6% | -0.24 | 34–35 (49%) | 50–39 (56%) | 108.0 | -1.26 | — | 1783 | 122.9 | -0.54 | -3.28 | 0.825 | 47.3% | -24 | +10 | +3 | 31.8% | -1.04 | 9–18 (33%) | 16–24 (40%) | 93.1 | +0.24 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 29, 2013 | H2H |
| Janko Tipsarevic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 1, 2012 | H2H |
| Lukas Lacko | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Florian Mayer | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 28, 2012 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 28, 2014 | H2H |
| Albert Montanes | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 21, 2014 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 26, 2014 | H2H |
| Horacio Zeballos | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 15, 2014 | H2H |
| Julien Benneteau | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 26, 2013 | H2H |