H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Philipp Petzschner vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Philipp Petzschner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6(6) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Michal Przysiezny | 6-3 7-6(6) 6-0 | Philipp Petzschner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 85 | 104 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Philipp Petzschner | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |