H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Philipp Petzschner vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 1-1
Philipp Petzschner and Thiemo de Bakker are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2011 Rotterdam third round 6-4 0-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2011* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Thiemo de Bakker | 6-4 0-6 6-1 | Philipp Petzschner | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2011* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Philipp Petzschner | 6-1 6-7(5) 7-6(3) | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 85 | 104 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |