H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Radu Albot vs Marius Copil H2H: 1-0

Radu Albot holds a 1–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radu Albot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2019 Indian Wells Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Radu Albot
Moldova Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Radu Albot #53 6-2 6-2 Marius Copil #76 Match data Mar 9, 2019* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Radu Albot #497 #39 1,137 1,896 90 140 39.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radu Albot Marius Copil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0
24 2014 1–4 20.0% #168 1,606 0 0 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #121 1,614 0 0 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0
26 2016 4–11 26.7% #97 1,675 0 0 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0
27 2017 9–17 34.6% #87 1,670 0 0 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0
28 2018 12–23 34.3% #98 1,714 0 0 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0
29 2019 31–26 54.4% #46 1,816 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2020 7–10 41.2% #93 1,732 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2021 6–15 28.6% #123 1,570 0 1 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0
32 2022 9–10 47.4% #103 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 7–12 36.8% #131 1,648 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2024 3–7 30.0% #163 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #434 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Radu Albot Marius Copil
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2015 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2018 6 14 20 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2019 23 17 40 57.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 5 8 13 38.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 86 147 41.5% 21 38 59 35.6% 8 16 24 33.3% — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/230 of Radu Albot's and 128/128 of Marius Copil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Radu Albot Marius Copil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6%
24 2014 5/5 1.6 3.4 65.9% 63.1% 42.1% 63.5% 39.3% 56.6% 38.8% 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6%
25 2015 5/5 1.0 3.0 65.1% 59.1% 37.6% 42.6% 38.4% 51.7% 39.0% 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0%
26 2016 13/15 2.2 3.2 66.2% 61.1% 48.7% 55.0% 46.8% 56.9% 36.0% 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5%
27 2017 26/26 3.0 2.9 62.8% 66.2% 50.6% 48.3% 43.6% 60.2% 35.7% 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3%
28 2018 35/35 2.4 3.3 65.2% 65.9% 49.5% 55.6% 39.4% 60.0% 36.4% 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3%
29 2019 57/57 3.4 2.6 63.0% 67.2% 53.0% 55.2% 43.3% 61.9% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 16/17 1.7 3.1 61.8% 64.9% 49.3% 53.7% 39.5% 59.2% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 21/21 3.0 3.9 63.0% 64.4% 45.7% 51.9% 34.6% 57.2% 35.3% 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3%
32 2022 19/19 3.4 3.1 63.6% 69.1% 49.8% 60.8% 36.8% 62.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 19/19 2.3 2.9 62.8% 65.5% 46.6% 55.4% 34.5% 58.7% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 10/10 3.2 3.7 64.5% 66.3% 50.0% 51.2% 38.0% 60.7% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.0% 51.0% 54.0% 20.0% 33.0% 52.0% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227/230 2.7 3.1 63.6% 65.7% 49.5% 54.1% 40.1% 59.8% 36.7% — 128/128 11.1 3.1 57.8% 75.2% 52.2% 59.8% 35.6% 65.3% 32.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Radu Albot Marius Copil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14
20 2010 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
21 2011 1497 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32
22 2012 1466 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16
23 2013 1438 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.33
24 2014 1607 122.1 -2.31 -0.70 0.894 47.8% — +40 — 35.7% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.21 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.66
25 2015 1614 123.1 -2.79 +0.03 0.807 45.7% +3 — — 30.8% -1.54 0–1 1–0 — -0.35 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30
26 2016 1676 124.8 -4.13 -0.78 0.836 47.2% -39 -7 — 34.9% -0.81 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.16 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.06
27 2017 1670 129.9 -2.66 -1.11 0.896 48.1% -17 -38 -35 40.3% -0.61 2–5 (29%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.49 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.13
28 2018 1714 135.8 -3.43 +1.06 0.911 48.2% -18 -113 -36 37.5% -0.58 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.10 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.18
29 2019 1817 153.0 -1.61 +1.82 0.993 50.0% +29 -125 -190 52.1% -0.06 10–10 (50%) 18–10 (64%) — -0.81 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1732 124.6 -1.95 +0.59 0.918 47.9% +30 -87 — 42.9% -0.50 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.67 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1571 116.4 -4.13 -1.09 0.825 46.4% +75 +15 — 33.3% -1.05 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.63 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
32 2022 1663 128.4 -1.24 +0.24 0.983 49.7% +11 — +47 50.0% -0.10 2–5 (29%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1648 124.0 -3.20 -0.54 0.864 47.6% -30 +19 — 33.3% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1674 122.8 -1.89 +1.37 0.932 48.4% -6 — — 33.3% -0.70 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1577 102.9 -0.87 -4.65 0.667 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 133.7 -2.56 +0.39 0.914 48.4% +10 -59 -48 41.3% -0.55 34–41 (45%) 53–53 (50%) 102.4 -0.15 — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.