H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 4-0

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2010 Rome Masters fourth round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 30, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Rafael Nadal #3 6-3 6-2 Victor Hanescu #39 Match data
Oct 20, 2005* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 7-6(5) 6-3 Victor Hanescu #42 Match data
May 5, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #7 6-1 6-1 Victor Hanescu #85 Match data
Aug 12, 2004* Sopot ATP 250 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #71 6-4 6-4 Victor Hanescu #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 — — — — — — —
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 — — — — — — —
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 — — — — — — —
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —