H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Ray Ruffels vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 1-4
Andres Gimeno holds a 4–1 lead over Ray Ruffels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andres Gimeno leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gimeno won the 1972 US Open third round 5-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 1972* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Andres Gimeno | 5-2 (ret.) | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1970* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andres Gimeno | 6-3 6-2 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1970* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ray Ruffels | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1969* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Andres Gimeno | 6-2 11-9 6-2 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1968* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Andres Gimeno | 6-4 6-4 6-3 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Andres Gimeno | #150 | #49 | 0 | 2,038 | 246 | 131 | 65.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ray Ruffels | Andres Gimeno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 48–27 | 64.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 45–26 | 63.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 53–23 | 69.7% | — | 1,899 | 1 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #136 | 1,792 | 1 | 12 |