H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Ray Ruffels vs Bob Carmichael H2H: 2-3
Bob Carmichael holds a 3–2 lead over Ray Ruffels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ray Ruffels leads 2–1 on grass, while Bob Carmichael leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1976 Brisbane fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1976* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 6-3 6-2 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1972* | Boston Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bob Carmichael | 6-3 6-4 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 7-5 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1969* | Haverford | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Bob Carmichael | 6-4 8-6 6-3 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1968* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Bob Carmichael | 0-6 6-3 6-4 7-5 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Bob Carmichael | #157 | #55 | 0 | 1,903 | 215 | 256 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ray Ruffels | Bob Carmichael | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 48–33 | 59.3% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 36–33 | 52.2% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 20–30 | 40.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 24–37 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #112 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #71 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #134 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–18 | 5.3% | #220 | 1,428 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |