H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ray Ruffels vs Jim Mcmanus H2H: 2-1
Ray Ruffels holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Mcmanus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ray Ruffels leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1976 Wimbledon first round 9-7 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 9-7 6-1 6-1 | Jim Mcmanus | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1969* | Berkeley | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Mcmanus | 8-6 6-1 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1969* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ray Ruffels | 6-4 6-0 | Jim Mcmanus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Jim Mcmanus | #418 | #90 | 0 | 1,730 | 132 | 222 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ray Ruffels | Jim Mcmanus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 29–34 | 46.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 14–27 | 34.1% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 14–26 | 35.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 16–32 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #132 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #152 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–17 | 5.6% | #192 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #332 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,348 | 0 | 0 |