H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ray Ruffels vs Pat Cramer H2H: 1-1
Ray Ruffels and Pat Cramer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1976 Boston second round 6-1 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1976* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ray Ruffels | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1975* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pat Cramer | 6-4 6-3 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ray Ruffels | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |