H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ray Ruffels vs Peter Pokorny H2H: 1-0
Ray Ruffels holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Pokorny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ray Ruffels leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1969 Munich fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 85
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1969* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ray Ruffels | 6-4 6-3 | Peter Pokorny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Peter Pokorny | #300 | #221 | 0 | 1,529 | 18 | 36 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ray Ruffels | Peter Pokorny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,405 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |