H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Cedrik-Marcel Stebe H2H: 2-0
Reilly Opelka holds a 2–0 lead over Cedrik-Marcel Stebe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Reilly Opelka leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Reilly Opelka won the 2022 Dallas fourth round 7-6(3) 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Germany
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2022* | Dallas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 7-6(3) 7-6(8) | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Reilly Opelka | 6-3 7-6(4) 6-1 | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | #366 | #71 | 688 | 1,756 | 29 | 49 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #177 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #82 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #165 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |