H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 1-0
Reilly Opelka holds a 1–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Reilly Opelka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Reilly Opelka won the 2019 Shanghai Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2019* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 6-3 6-4 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |