H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 1-1
Reilly Opelka and Filip Krajinovic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Filip Krajinovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Reilly Opelka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Filip Krajinovic | 7-6(5) 6-2 6-3 | Reilly Opelka | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2021* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 6-3 7-6(4) | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |