H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Jack Sock H2H: 2-1
Reilly Opelka holds a 2–1 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Reilly Opelka leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jack Sock leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Reilly Opelka won the 2022 Delray Beach fourth round 6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2022* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-1 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jack Sock | 6-4 6-4 6-3 | Reilly Opelka | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2018* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Jack Sock | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Jack Sock | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |