H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 0-2
Pablo Cuevas holds a 2–0 lead over Reilly Opelka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2021 Geneva third round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2021* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Cuevas | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Reilly Opelka | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2020* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pablo Cuevas | 5-7 7-6(9) 7-6(2) | Reilly Opelka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |