H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Ricardas Berankis vs Bradley Klahn
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Ricardas Berankis vs Bradley Klahn.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bradley Klahn | #1,096 | #63 | 731 | 1,733 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardas Berankis | Bradley Klahn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #248 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #148 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #877 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |