H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Ricardo Mello vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-0
Ricardo Mello holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Mello leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ricardo Mello won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 3-6 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 45
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2012 | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 6-4 6-4 | Ricardo Mello | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ricardo Mello | 3-6 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) 6-2 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Mello | #1,018 | #50 | 738 | 1,773 | 52 | 87 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Mello | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #133 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #71 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #134 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #257 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1018 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |