H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Andrei Pavel H2H: 2-0
Richard Fromberg holds a 2–0 lead over Andrei Pavel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Fromberg leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 2000 Estoril third round 6-0 6-7(5) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2000* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 6-0 6-7(5) 7-6(7) | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1998* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 6-3 6-4 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Andrei Pavel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |