H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-0
Richard Fromberg holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1993 Manchester third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1993* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Richard Fromberg | 6-4 7-6(4) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |