H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs David Wheaton H2H: 2-1
Richard Fromberg holds a 2–1 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1994 US Open first round 4-6 6-4 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Richard Fromberg | 4-6 6-4 6-2 3-6 6-3 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| May 8, 1993* | Tampa | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Wheaton | 6-0 4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |