H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 1-0
Richard Fromberg holds a 1–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1993 Schenectady fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1993* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Richard Fromberg | 7-5 6-3 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Kenneth Carlsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 |