H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 1-2
Thomas Enqvist holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-4 7-6(4) 4-6 3-6 10-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Richard Fromberg | 6-4 7-6(4) 4-6 3-6 10-8 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-4 6-4 7-5 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1996* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-3 6-1 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |