Rik De Voest
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Seppi | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 16, 2012 | H2H |
| David Nalbandian | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 1, 2010 | H2H |
| Ivan Navarro | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 5, 2009 | H2H |
| Tommy Robredo | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 14, 2007 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Rik De Voest vs Antonio Veic
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Rik De Voest vs Antonio Veic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rik De Voest | 6-1 6-0 | Antonio Veic | Match data | Aug 30, 2010 | Q1 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,692 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Antonio Veic | #888 | #119 | 468 | 1,718 | 10 | 22 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #220 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #191 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2011 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 16 | 30 | 46 | 34.8% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 52.2% | 62.9% | 34.4% | 64.3% | 66.7% | 49.3% | 38.5% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3/3 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 56.6% | 69.5% | 52.4% | 71.5% | 56.7% | 62.0% | 35.8% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4/4 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 66.2% | 63.9% | 57.3% | 55.4% | 62.6% | 61.4% | 36.5% |
| 23 | 2003 | 4/4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 62.9% | 73.6% | 51.7% | 55.0% | 23.6% | 64.6% | 33.9% | 2011 | 10/10 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 58.5% | 63.2% | 42.4% | 48.2% | 54.4% | 54.3% | 39.1% |
| 24 | 2004 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 55.9% | 68.2% | 55.4% | 63.4% | 44.7% | 62.5% | 35.6% | 2012 | 8/8 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 64.3% | 68.9% | 47.9% | 50.4% | 47.1% | 61.5% | 40.2% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5/5 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 66.3% | 56.3% | 43.2% | 30.8% | 39.3% | 51.0% | 31.6% |
| 26 | 2006 | 9/9 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 58.0% | 67.0% | 48.0% | 61.8% | 30.9% | 59.1% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 7/7 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 60.9% | 72.4% | 46.1% | 57.3% | 31.4% | 61.7% | 38.4% | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 65.6% | 62.5% | 28.6% | 55.6% | 25.0% | 50.8% | 33.3% |
| 28 | 2008 | 10/10 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 57.6% | 68.1% | 50.8% | 51.5% | 52.8% | 60.5% | 33.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 6/6 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 58.1% | 68.1% | 47.5% | 57.5% | 35.2% | 58.5% | 31.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 3/3 | 7.3 | 2.3 | 65.9% | 66.2% | 47.8% | 50.1% | 38.7% | 59.8% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 9/9 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 61.1% | 69.8% | 47.8% | 64.8% | 37.8% | 61.1% | 35.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 3/3 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 66.2% | 65.9% | 45.3% | 53.3% | 30.2% | 59.3% | 32.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 68.9% | 56.9% | 47.8% | 63.6% | 33.3% | 54.1% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 57/57 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 60.0% | 68.7% | 48.9% | 58.1% | 37.5% | 60.6% | 34.1% | — | 32/32 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 62.0% | 64.2% | 46.0% | 49.8% | 50.9% | 56.9% | 37.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1453 | 90.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1445 | 99.2 | -0.85 | -5.19 | 0.758 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1469 | 110.3 | +0.50 | +0.45 | 0.943 | 49.3% | +81 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.13 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1488 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1532 | 107.8 | -2.29 | -0.16 | 0.946 | 48.7% | +46 | — | — | 30.0% | -0.50 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1469 | 105.2 | -0.66 | +1.23 | 0.958 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.13 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.08 | 2011 | 1671 | 121.9 | -3.75 | +0.44 | 0.855 | 46.8% | -50 | +63 | — | 34.6% | -0.81 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.16 |
| 24 | 2004 | 1509 | 105.1 | -0.63 | -0.05 | 0.950 | 49.7% | +36 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.28 | 2012 | 1642 | 118.3 | -1.65 | -0.78 | 1.045 | 50.7% | -22 | +89 | — | 42.1% | +0.11 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.12 |
| 25 | 2005 | 1504 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1583 | 108.5 | -3.24 | -2.73 | 0.645 | 41.5% | — | +148 | — | 16.7% | -2.75 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 26 | 2006 | 1451 | 112.9 | -1.37 | -2.43 | 0.791 | 46.3% | +35 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.15 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | 2014 | 1599 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 1581 | 111.0 | -1.61 | +1.14 | 1.003 | 50.2% | -3 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | — | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.13 | 2015 | 1549 | 102.7 | -1.93 | -0.71 | 0.678 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 28 | 2008 | 1651 | 120.0 | -2.23 | -1.52 | 0.834 | 47.1% | +18 | — | — | 30.4% | -1.22 | 1–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1576 | 109.5 | -3.14 | -1.79 | 0.761 | 46.0% | +30 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.23 | 0–1 | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 1630 | 119.7 | -1.54 | -0.67 | 0.860 | 47.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.92 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 1665 | 118.2 | -0.48 | -1.65 | 0.907 | 49.0% | -23 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 1605 | 111.1 | -0.91 | -1.40 | 0.802 | 46.5% | +28 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 1585 | 113.2 | -2.33 | -1.71 | 0.725 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 1558 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1692 | 117.2 | -1.48 | -1.02 | 0.865 | 47.8% | +15 | — | — | 35.1% | -0.88 | 4–9 (31%) | 8–14 (36%) | 91.9 | +4.68 | — | 1718 | 116.9 | -2.42 | -0.65 | 0.868 | 47.2% | +14 | +92 | — | 32.9% | -0.89 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–9 (10%) | 97.1 | +0.56 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Antonio Veic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blaz Kavcic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 2012 | H2H |
| James Ward | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 5, 2015 | H2H |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 31, 2013 | H2H |
| Viktor Troicki | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 25, 2013 | H2H |
| Henri Laaksonen | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 11, 2013 | H2H |