H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Rik De Voest vs Frederico Gil H2H: 0-1

Frederico Gil holds a 1–0 lead over Rik De Voest in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frederico Gil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frederico Gil won the 2009 Johannesburg round of 16 4-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rik De Voest
RSA Age 46 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Frederico Gil
POR Age 41 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frederico Gil 4-6 7-5 6-4 Rik De Voest #162 Match data Feb 6, 2009* R16 Johannesburg ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rik De Voest #1,088 #110 538 1,692 19 38 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Frederico Gil — — — 1,782 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rik De Voest Frederico Gil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 2003 2–2 50.0% #241 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2004 3–2 60.0% #207 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2006 2–7 22.2% #135 1,451 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2007 3–4 42.9% #120 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2008 3–7 30.0% #159 1,651 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2009 1–5 16.7% #236 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2010 0–3 0.0% #181 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2011 5–4 55.6% #126 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2012 0–3 0.0% #258 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #171 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rik De Voest Frederico Gil
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2004 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 8 6 14 57.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 7 8 12.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 30 46 34.8% — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — 16 24 40 40.0% 32 35 67 47.8% 1 7 8 12.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 57/57 of Rik De Voest's and 114/115 of Frederico Gil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rik De Voest Frederico Gil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/3 1.0 0.5 77.9% 57.4% 37.0% 66.7% 25.0% 53.5% 36.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 2.3 2.3 62.3% 62.4% 51.3% 37.5% 35.0% 58.3% 36.2%
23 2003 4/4 1.3 1.5 62.9% 73.6% 51.7% 55.0% 23.6% 64.6% 33.9% 2008 6/6 3.0 2.7 68.3% 67.6% 51.0% 65.9% 36.3% 62.0% 35.0%
24 2004 5/5 5.8 3.0 55.9% 68.2% 55.4% 63.4% 44.7% 62.5% 35.6% 2009 33/33 3.1 2.3 61.2% 68.2% 50.7% 55.6% 44.1% 61.5% 36.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 21/21 2.1 2.0 66.6% 59.7% 47.4% 54.7% 43.4% 55.5% 36.3%
26 2006 9/9 3.6 2.1 58.0% 67.0% 48.0% 61.8% 30.9% 59.1% 32.4% 2011 27/27 2.3 1.9 64.6% 63.7% 47.7% 51.8% 41.4% 57.9% 38.3%
27 2007 7/7 3.6 1.7 60.9% 72.4% 46.1% 57.3% 31.4% 61.7% 38.4% 2012 22/22 1.7 1.9 62.8% 64.7% 50.9% 56.4% 41.3% 59.4% 37.4%
28 2008 10/10 4.1 2.3 57.6% 68.1% 50.8% 51.5% 52.8% 60.5% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 6/6 2.8 2.2 58.1% 68.1% 47.5% 57.5% 35.2% 58.5% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 3/3 7.3 2.3 65.9% 66.2% 47.8% 50.1% 38.7% 59.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 9/9 4.1 1.2 61.1% 69.8% 47.8% 64.8% 37.8% 61.1% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 3/3 5.0 0.0 66.2% 65.9% 45.3% 53.3% 30.2% 59.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1/1 3.0 1.0 68.9% 56.9% 47.8% 63.6% 33.3% 54.1% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rik De Voest Frederico Gil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1539 103.7 +0.35 +0.51 0.779 46.2% — +27 — 50.0% -0.75 2–0 1–0 — -0.19
22 2002 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1593 115.1 +0.47 -1.50 0.868 47.1% — +24 — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–2 — -0.26
23 2003 1469 105.2 -0.66 +1.23 0.958 48.7% — — — 50.0% +0.13 — 0–1 — +0.08 2008 1624 117.9 -1.81 +1.60 0.920 48.5% — +37 — 38.9% -0.67 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
24 2004 1509 105.1 -0.63 -0.05 0.950 49.7% +36 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 1–0 — +0.28 2009 1656 139.8 -1.33 -0.33 0.951 49.1% +1 +25 -42 45.0% -0.32 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) 105.0 -0.88
25 2005 1504 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1613 122.3 -4.71 -0.35 0.816 46.3% -32 +111 — 36.7% -0.86 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 106.2 +0.07
26 2006 1451 112.9 -1.37 -2.43 0.791 46.3% +35 — — 30.0% -1.15 0–2 0–1 — +0.04 2011 1624 132.4 -2.73 +0.39 0.910 48.2% +26 +81 — 37.7% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 -0.33
27 2007 1581 111.0 -1.61 +1.14 1.003 50.2% -3 — — 28.6% -1.43 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.13 2012 1610 123.8 -2.31 +0.07 0.921 48.6% +64 +46 — 41.2% -0.57 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +0.42
28 2008 1651 120.0 -2.23 -1.52 0.834 47.1% +18 — — 30.4% -1.22 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.47 2013 1572 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1576 109.5 -3.14 -1.79 0.761 46.0% +30 — — 23.1% -1.23 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.41 2014 1536 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 1630 119.7 -1.54 -0.67 0.860 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.92 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.05 2015 1534 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 1665 118.2 -0.48 -1.65 0.907 49.0% -23 — — 47.6% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 1605 111.1 -0.91 -1.40 0.802 46.5% +28 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–2 0–1 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1585 113.2 -2.33 -1.71 0.725 44.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13 2018 1542 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 1558 101.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1692 117.2 -1.48 -1.02 0.865 47.8% +15 — — 35.1% -0.88 4–9 (31%) 8–14 (36%) 91.9 +4.68 — 1783 130.2 -2.42 0.00 0.901 48.1% +13 +59 -42 40.6% -0.59 23–15 (61%) 15–20 (43%) 104.8 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.