Rik De Voest
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Seppi | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 16, 2012 | H2H |
| David Nalbandian | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 1, 2010 | H2H |
| Ivan Navarro | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 5, 2009 | H2H |
| Tommy Robredo | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 14, 2007 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Rik De Voest vs Juan Albert Viloca Puig
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Rik De Voest vs Juan Albert Viloca Puig.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rik De Voest | 7-6(5) (ret.) | Juan Albert Viloca Puig | Match data | May 25, 2004* | Q2 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,692 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Juan Albert Viloca Puig | — | — | — | 1,668 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Juan Albert Viloca Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Juan Albert Viloca Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2003 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 16 | 30 | 46 | 34.8% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 23 | 28 | 17.9% | 41 | 52 | 93 | 44.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Juan Albert Viloca Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1496 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | 25.0% | -1.38 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.04 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1504 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.16 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1567 | 125.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | 43.5% | -0.26 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.30 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1488 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1473 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | 11.8% | -2.24 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.24 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1469 | 105.2 | -0.66 | +1.23 | 0.958 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.13 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.08 | 1996 | 1526 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | 42.9% | -0.50 | 2–0 | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.25 |
| 24 | 2004 | 1509 | 105.1 | -0.63 | -0.05 | 0.950 | 49.7% | +36 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.28 | 1997 | 1614 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | -168 | +85 | — | 42.1% | -0.41 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | -0.55 |
| 25 | 2005 | 1504 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1535 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | -117 | +85 | — | 36.0% | -0.97 | 4–8 (33%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +0.02 |
| 26 | 2006 | 1451 | 112.9 | -1.37 | -2.43 | 0.791 | 46.3% | +35 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.15 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | 1999 | 1518 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +98 | — | 30.0% | -1.20 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.09 |
| 27 | 2007 | 1581 | 111.0 | -1.61 | +1.14 | 1.003 | 50.2% | -3 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | — | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.13 | 2000 | 1539 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | -114 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.42 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.07 |
| 28 | 2008 | 1651 | 120.0 | -2.23 | -1.52 | 0.834 | 47.1% | +18 | — | — | 30.4% | -1.22 | 1–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.47 | 2001 | 1568 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +68 | — | 50.0% | -0.12 | 2–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.31 |
| 29 | 2009 | 1576 | 109.5 | -3.14 | -1.79 | 0.761 | 46.0% | +30 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.23 | 0–1 | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.41 | 2002 | 1566 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 1630 | 119.7 | -1.54 | -0.67 | 0.860 | 47.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.92 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 1665 | 118.2 | -0.48 | -1.65 | 0.907 | 49.0% | -23 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.95 | 2004 | 1534 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 1605 | 111.1 | -0.91 | -1.40 | 0.802 | 46.5% | +28 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 1585 | 113.2 | -2.33 | -1.71 | 0.725 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 1558 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1692 | 117.2 | -1.48 | -1.02 | 0.865 | 47.8% | +15 | — | — | 35.1% | -0.88 | 4–9 (31%) | 8–14 (36%) | 91.9 | +4.68 | — | 1669 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | -139 | +70 | — | 38.5% | -0.70 | 18–19 (49%) | 21–25 (46%) | 101.9 | -0.29 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Juan Albert Viloca Puig
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Costa | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 10, 1998 | — |
| Marcelo Rios | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 21, 2000 | — |
| Juan Antonio Marin | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 1, 2001 | — |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 15, 1998 | — |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 9, 1998 | — |