H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC

Roberto Carballes Baena vs Martin Klizan H2H: 1-0

Roberto Carballes Baena holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberto Carballes Baena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Carballes Baena won the 2019 St. Petersburg round of 32 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Carballes Baena
Spain Age 33 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberto Carballes Baena #77 6-2 7-5 Martin Klizan #90 Match data Sep 19, 2019* R32 St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberto Carballes Baena #259 #49 1,071 1,797 129 166 43.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Carballes Baena Martin Klizan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0
20 2013 0–1 0.0% #267 1,490 0 0 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0
21 2014 3–3 50.0% #167 1,553 0 0 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0
22 2015 1–2 33.3% #131 1,603 0 0 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1
23 2016 6–9 40.0% #145 1,662 0 0 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1
24 2017 3–2 60.0% #106 1,590 0 0 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2
25 2018 14–17 45.2% #73 1,659 0 1 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3
26 2019 19–20 48.7% #80 1,714 0 1 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5
27 2020 6–8 42.9% #97 1,678 0 1 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5
28 2021 11–17 39.3% #79 1,729 0 1 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6
29 2022 11–18 37.9% #74 1,725 0 1 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6
30 2023 19–24 44.2% #63 1,689 0 2 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6
31 2024 25–26 49.0% #57 1,733 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2025 11–18 37.9% #129 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #259 1,574 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberto Carballes Baena Martin Klizan
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2014 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2015 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2017 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — —
29 2022 4 8 12 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2023 3 9 12 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2024 10 12 22 45.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 7 10 17 41.2% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 36 60 96 37.5% 89 92 181 49.2% 4 14 18 22.2% — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/295 of Roberto Carballes Baena's and 271/275 of Martin Klizan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberto Carballes Baena Martin Klizan
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2%
20 2013 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.9% 53.6% 30.8% 50.0% 42.9% 42.6% 45.6% 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4%
21 2014 6/6 1.7 3.5 59.7% 60.4% 49.1% 55.9% 58.2% 55.9% 42.6% 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2%
22 2015 3/3 2.7 2.7 61.8% 62.4% 45.1% 62.0% 69.5% 56.0% 35.3% 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4%
23 2016 15/15 4.1 2.6 61.8% 70.2% 51.5% 54.9% 40.0% 62.6% 36.4% 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4%
24 2017 5/5 5.0 4.4 57.7% 75.9% 60.4% 74.4% 44.8% 69.4% 41.5% 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9%
25 2018 31/31 2.4 3.6 62.6% 70.9% 49.2% 58.2% 41.2% 62.8% 36.4% 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4%
26 2019 39/39 3.3 3.3 62.1% 67.0% 50.2% 57.5% 48.7% 60.6% 39.2% 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5%
27 2020 14/14 1.9 2.4 65.9% 60.7% 49.8% 53.0% 37.6% 56.1% 36.9% 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6%
28 2021 26/28 2.4 2.7 64.4% 63.2% 48.8% 49.9% 40.3% 58.0% 39.6% 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8%
29 2022 29/29 1.9 2.9 61.6% 66.3% 52.2% 59.4% 61.7% 60.7% 35.2% 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1%
30 2023 43/43 2.4 2.4 62.5% 69.0% 51.8% 53.2% 45.5% 62.4% 38.1% 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8%
31 2024 51/51 2.8 2.1 65.3% 67.8% 52.0% 55.7% 38.2% 62.2% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 29/29 3.3 2.8 60.9% 65.6% 47.7% 55.9% 40.1% 58.5% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1/1 7.0 2.0 69.0% 76.0% 47.0% 0.0% 0.0% 67.0% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0%
Career — 293/295 2.7 2.8 62.8% 67.1% 50.5% 55.7% 44.5% 60.8% 37.8% — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberto Carballes Baena Martin Klizan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1486 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11
20 2013 1491 100.9 +0.48 -1.32 0.795 44.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14
21 2014 1554 120.6 -2.56 +0.37 0.966 49.8% — +55 — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28
22 2015 1603 116.9 -1.36 -0.96 0.802 46.4% — +62 — 28.6% -1.14 1–0 — — -0.20 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.2 +0.80
23 2016 1663 122.2 -0.68 -0.77 0.974 49.2% — +43 — 45.9% -0.54 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.7 +0.36 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 93.2 +0.17
24 2017 1591 117.8 +2.09 +0.57 1.359 55.0% — +50 — 66.7% +1.25 0–2 1–1 — +0.84 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) 108.8 -2.11
25 2018 1660 135.3 -0.61 -0.31 0.979 49.5% -110 +23 — 45.3% -0.31 5–4 (56%) 11–7 (61%) 106.0 +0.63 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) 110.6 -0.15
26 2019 1715 141.7 -2.75 +2.19 0.994 50.2% -112 +50 -192 49.0% +0.05 8–8 (50%) 6–8 (43%) 100.6 +0.78 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 99.4 +1.22
27 2020 1678 120.1 -4.48 -0.47 0.840 46.6% -94 +71 — 42.9% -0.69 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 -0.38
28 2021 1730 132.1 -3.52 +1.98 0.942 48.4% -112 +53 — 41.2% -0.50 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 99.0 -0.86 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) 109.8 -2.08
29 2022 1726 134.1 -2.32 -0.71 0.897 48.3% -101 +37 — 40.8% -0.53 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) 101.3 -0.71 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.18
30 2023 1689 135.3 -1.01 +1.17 1.012 50.1% -110 +98 -173 42.7% -0.50 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) 95.8 -1.42 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
31 2024 1733 141.2 -1.18 +1.26 0.990 49.7% -60 +49 -204 45.2% -0.35 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 104.7 -1.86 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1656 130.1 -3.93 +1.10 0.917 48.4% +14 +29 — 41.7% -0.60 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 95.8 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1574 112.7 -2.39 -3.12 0.758 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01
Career — 1797 138.3 -2.00 +0.79 0.963 49.3% -74 +52 -187 44.2% -0.38 44–46 (49%) 53–56 (49%) 101.7 -0.51 — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.