H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Robin Haase vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 0-1
Victor Hanescu holds a 1–0 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2011 Nice quarterfinal 6-2 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2011* | Nice | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Victor Hanescu | 6-2 2-0 (ret.) | Robin Haase | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Haase | Victor Hanescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |