H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Roger Taylor vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 1-2
Ray Ruffels holds a 2–1 lead over Roger Taylor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Ray Ruffels leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1977 Wimbledon first round 7-5 8-6 2-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 84
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1977* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 7-5 8-6 2-6 9-7 | Roger Taylor | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1972* | Cleveland Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Ray Ruffels | 7-6 6-4 | Roger Taylor | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1970* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Roger Taylor | 6-4 6-4 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Taylor | #372 | #11 | 0 | 2,004 | 369 | 296 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Taylor | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1968 | 27–51 | 34.6% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1969 | 49–31 | 61.2% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1970 | 62–37 | 62.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1971 | 44–37 | 54.3% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,901 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1973 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1974 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #42 | 1,849 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1975 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #52 | 1,797 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #80 | 1,702 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1977 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,602 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,552 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,519 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |