H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 1-2

Andrei Cherkasov holds a 2–1 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1996 Shanghai Masters round of 32 7-6(4) 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Cherkasov #177 7-6(4) 7-6(8) Ronald Agenor #174 Match data Feb 1, 1996* R32 Shanghai Masters World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Andrei Cherkasov #19 7-6(4) 6-3 Ronald Agenor #30 Match data Apr 25, 1991* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Ronald Agenor #70 7-6 7-6 Andrei Cherkasov #59 Match data Jun 14, 1990* R32 Florence ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Andrei Cherkasov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 257/282 of Andrei Cherkasov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 58/66 2.6 2.3 60.4% 68.1% 52.1% 61.2% 43.9% 61.9% 41.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 56/63 3.4 1.5 60.9% 68.6% 52.6% 59.2% 43.1% 62.3% 38.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 62/65 2.2 1.9 58.0% 66.2% 49.4% 58.2% 41.3% 58.9% 38.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 32/35 2.0 4.2 55.9% 61.0% 41.5% 45.2% 47.8% 52.5% 38.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 6/7 1.7 1.5 56.6% 60.6% 54.8% 40.9% 45.8% 57.8% 38.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 14/15 1.2 4.3 68.4% 61.3% 39.3% 43.9% 41.9% 54.7% 34.9%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% 1997 14/15 2.0 2.0 60.5% 63.5% 45.4% 57.3% 43.8% 56.7% 39.4%
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% 1998 3/3 2.3 3.3 54.9% 62.6% 47.1% 53.9% 57.4% 55.2% 35.1%
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% 1999 9/9 1.8 5.1 58.2% 66.8% 44.8% 59.9% 51.4% 57.2% 43.7%
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% 2000 3/4 1.7 3.7 58.6% 62.7% 51.9% 33.7% 62.1% 58.3% 34.4%
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2% — 257/375 2.4 2.5 59.6% 65.9% 48.9% 56.0% 44.1% 59.0% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1510 122.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1578 139.4 — — — — +40 -28 — 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 100.0 -0.78
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1990 1880 155.5 — — — — -6 -147 — 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 -2.83
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 — 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) 96.0 -1.80
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 — 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) 96.3 -2.86
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 — 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) 102.9 -1.60
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 — 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 93.5 -2.62
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% — +65 — 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 — 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 97.5 +0.66
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 — — 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +0.31
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — -0.13
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 — 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.30
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 — — 25.0% -0.88 — 0–1 — +0.05
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 2001 1437 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 — 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.