H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 2-1

Ronald Agenor holds a 2–1 lead over Carl Uwe Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1991 Genova quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Carl Uwe Steeb
GER Age 59 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carl Uwe Steeb #75 6-1 6-4 Ronald Agenor #28 Match data Jun 22, 1991* QF Genova ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Ronald Agenor #28 6-2 7-5 Carl Uwe Steeb #50 Match data Feb 14, 1991* R32 Brussels ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Ronald Agenor #45 3-6 6-2 6-2 Carl Uwe Steeb #24 Match data Jul 14, 1990* QF Swiss Open Gstaad ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Carl Uwe Steeb #1,355 #14 1,095 1,930 194 192 50.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Carl Uwe Steeb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #150 1,499 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1987 10–8 55.6% #41 1,632 0 0
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1988 22–19 53.7% #73 1,726 0 0
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1989 34–15 69.4% #15 1,864 0 1
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1990 21–21 50.0% #46 1,714 0 1
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1991 27–27 50.0% #38 1,744 0 2
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1992 33–25 56.9% #29 1,791 0 2
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1993 18–20 47.4% #94 1,719 0 2
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1994 8–18 30.8% #89 1,608 0 2
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1995 12–16 42.9% #67 1,661 0 3
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1996 7–19 26.9% #179 1,540 0 3
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1988 12 7 19 63.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 10 5 15 66.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 10 8 18 55.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 5 6 11 45.5% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 11 12 8.3% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 65 59 124 52.4% 76 79 155 49.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 51 47 98 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 209/230 of Carl Uwe Steeb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 51/54 2.7 1.2 61.2% 67.6% 49.6% 48.1% 45.2% 60.5% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 55/58 3.2 1.9 58.9% 67.9% 53.4% 64.4% 43.7% 61.9% 39.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 34/38 2.5 1.6 57.8% 66.3% 51.1% 55.0% 47.7% 59.7% 36.5%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% 1994 23/26 2.7 1.8 56.9% 65.4% 49.3% 60.7% 43.5% 58.5% 36.6%
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% 1995 23/28 2.3 2.5 59.8% 65.0% 47.9% 52.5% 33.5% 57.9% 34.4%
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% 1996 23/26 2.7 1.9 59.2% 64.9% 49.9% 49.5% 47.6% 58.7% 33.2%
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2% — 209/386 2.8 1.7 59.2% 66.6% 50.7% 55.5% 44.0% 60.1% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1500 106.6 — — — — — +53 — 38.5% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.42
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1987 1632 137.8 — — — — — +51 — 56.8% +0.68 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.23
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.06 1988 1727 139.0 — — — — +24 -102 — 50.9% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.36
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.67 1989 1864 154.0 — — — — -24 -14 — 64.5% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — -3.00
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.17 1990 1714 147.4 — — — — +45 +75 — 50.5% 0.00 9–12 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.11
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.17 1991 1745 142.9 -0.05 +1.22 1.026 50.4% -8 +21 — 51.1% +0.12 9–10 (47%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.15
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.70 1992 1792 145.3 +1.00 +1.59 1.033 50.7% -24 0 — 56.7% +0.47 11–8 (58%) 12–14 (46%) — -1.66
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.13 1993 1720 139.0 -0.63 -0.51 0.908 48.4% -7 +55 -191 48.3% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.90
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.22 1994 1608 124.8 -1.75 -2.12 0.882 47.6% +102 -18 — 34.5% -0.81 3–6 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.49
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) — -0.10 1995 1661 130.9 -2.93 -2.02 0.819 46.2% +75 -78 — 41.2% -0.78 6–3 (67%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.48
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.63 1996 1541 120.5 -2.41 -2.73 0.804 46.4% +38 +14 — 34.9% -1.25 2–6 (25%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.46
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1931 147.2 -0.63 -0.12 0.942 48.9% +17 +3 -191 50.9% +0.04 68–66 (51%) 57–60 (49%) 99.0 -2.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.