H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 1-1

Ronald Agenor and Claudio Panatta are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Claudio Panatta won the 1986 Bologna round of 32 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Claudio Panatta
ITA Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudio Panatta #152 7-5 6-4 Ronald Agenor #60 Match data Jun 12, 1986* R32 Bologna ATP 250 Clay
Ronald Agenor #110 7-6 3-6 6-4 Claudio Panatta #89 Match data Jul 10, 1985* R64 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Claudio Panatta #1,038 #46 18 1,749 100 135 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Claudio Panatta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1979 0–2 0.0% #546 1,468 0 0
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1981 7–6 53.8% — 1,551 0 0
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1982 29–26 52.7% #76 1,641 0 0
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1983 15–19 44.1% #68 1,702 0 0
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1984 10–19 34.5% #121 1,602 0 0
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1985 15–15 50.0% #92 1,592 0 1
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1986 7–16 30.4% #153 1,536 0 1
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1987 8–16 33.3% #225 1,547 0 1
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1988 8–7 53.3% #132 1,603 0 1
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 1989 1–9 10.0% #557 1,499 0 1
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Claudio Panatta
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 23 19 42 54.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 15 26 42.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 8 14 22 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 13 22 35 37.1% 81 101 182 44.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Claudio Panatta
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1979 1468 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.52
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1981 1551 125.8 — — — — — +39 — 51.7% -0.24 2–1 (67%) — — +0.79
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1982 1642 129.4 — — — — -60 +1 — 52.2% +0.08 11–9 (55%) 9–9 (50%) 102.8 +4.25
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1983 1702 137.7 — — — — -90 -30 — 43.5% -0.53 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 103.1 -2.80
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1984 1603 125.5 — — — — 0 +27 — 39.1% -0.97 2–8 (20%) 5–3 (63%) 95.9 -0.57
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1985 1592 130.4 — — — — -30 +47 — 50.6% +0.22 5–7 (42%) 10–7 (59%) 100.0 +0.78
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 1986 1537 125.2 — — — — +16 +32 — 41.0% -0.51 2–8 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 94.1 +0.47
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 1987 1548 130.2 — — — — +16 +1 — 38.7% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 96.1 -1.32
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 1988 1603 125.1 — — — — — +11 — 57.9% +0.39 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.3 +1.20
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 1989 1499 99.4 — — — — — +29 — 13.0% -2.35 1–0 0–1 — +0.28
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1750 134.3 — — — — -31 +13 — 45.1% -0.35 35–50 (41%) 38–37 (51%) 98.2 +1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.