Ronald Agenor
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | 3 | 6 | 9 | Jun 14, 2000 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 1 | 6 | 7 | Sep 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Sergi Bruguera | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 29, 1994 | H2H |
| Javier Sanchez | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 3, 1995 | H2H |
| Omar Camporese | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 15, 1992 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Ronald Agenor vs Dan Nahirny H2H: 1-0
Ronald Agenor holds a 1–0 lead over Dan Nahirny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1986 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 64 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | 6-3 6-1 | Dan Nahirny | Match data | Jul 23, 1986* | R64 | U.S. Pro Tennis Championships | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,896 | 215 | 253 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dan Nahirny | #920 | #679 | 0 | 1,500 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ronald Agenor | Dan Nahirny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,530 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Ronald Agenor | Dan Nahirny | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1984 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 42 | 76 | 118 | 35.6% | 138 | 130 | 268 | 51.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 32 | 41 | 73 | 43.8% | Career | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Ronald Agenor | Dan Nahirny | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1984 | 1481 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.07 | 1984 | 1492 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 1985 | 1658 | 140.8 | — | — | — | — | -107 | +24 | — | 51.4% | +0.27 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.06 | 1985 | 1486 | 104.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| 1986 | 1673 | 146.8 | — | — | — | — | -122 | +62 | — | 48.5% | +0.17 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -1.67 | 1986 | 1478 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1987 | 1737 | 146.2 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +50 | — | 52.5% | +0.28 | 11–9 (55%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1758 | 147.5 | — | — | — | — | -108 | +114 | — | 54.5% | +0.37 | 10–5 (67%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -2.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1767 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | -86 | +69 | — | 56.6% | +0.51 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | -0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1817 | 146.9 | — | — | — | — | -53 | +22 | — | 52.4% | +0.25 | 14–7 (67%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -2.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1644 | 129.0 | -2.96 | -1.86 | 0.840 | 46.7% | +4 | +89 | — | 41.5% | -0.55 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1538 | 118.8 | -3.87 | -0.90 | 0.853 | 46.8% | +65 | +61 | — | 35.2% | -0.52 | 2–8 (20%) | 0–8 (0%) | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1603 | 135.0 | -0.84 | +0.11 | 0.956 | 49.1% | -46 | +90 | — | 44.2% | -0.28 | 6–10 (38%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | -0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1580 | 139.1 | -0.81 | -0.72 | 0.907 | 48.4% | -20 | +103 | — | 42.2% | -0.44 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | -1.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1586 | 133.1 | -0.47 | -0.84 | 0.927 | 48.7% | +44 | +35 | — | 43.8% | -0.29 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1525 | 105.4 | +0.11 | -1.40 | 0.854 | 46.6% | +53 | — | — | 9.1% | -1.91 | 0–1 | 0–6 (0%) | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1531 | 103.2 | -1.61 | -0.77 | 0.999 | 49.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1521 | 118.4 | -1.43 | -2.23 | 0.813 | 46.6% | +36 | +84 | — | 31.8% | -0.82 | 1–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1430 | 102.3 | -2.84 | -1.35 | 0.891 | 47.4% | +45 | +90 | +95 | 33.9% | -1.20 | 1–6 (14%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1467 | 112.1 | -2.05 | +0.32 | 0.908 | 48.9% | +50 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.50 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1896 | 144.1 | -1.82 | -0.97 | 0.891 | 47.8% | -37 | +67 | +95 | 47.0% | -0.08 | 82–92 (47%) | 65–114 (36%) | 89.5 | -1.50 | Career | 1500 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -6.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Dan Nahirny
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 23, 1986 | H2H |
| Greg Holmes | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 15, 1985 | H2H |
| John Lloyd | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 2, 1984 | — |