H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Darren Cahill H2H: 1-2

Darren Cahill holds a 2–1 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Darren Cahill leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Darren Cahill won the 1989 Tokyo Indoor quarterfinal 3-6 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Darren Cahill
AUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Darren Cahill #93 3-6 7-6 6-4 Ronald Agenor #40 Match data Oct 22, 1989* QF Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet
Ronald Agenor #63 7-6 4-6 6-3 Darren Cahill #143 Match data Jul 17, 1987* R16 Bordeaux ATP 250 Clay
Darren Cahill #144 0-6 6-4 7-5 Ronald Agenor #72 Match data Apr 29, 1987* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Darren Cahill #538 #22 823 1,889 132 116 53.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Darren Cahill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1984 2–4 33.3% #268 1,502 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1985 11–12 47.8% #132 1,578 0 0
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1986 5–6 45.5% #137 1,549 0 0
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1987 17–18 48.6% #82 1,660 0 0
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1988 32–23 58.2% #27 1,768 0 1
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1989 23–19 54.8% #53 1,756 0 1
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1990 22–19 53.7% #57 1,820 0 1
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1991 15–6 71.4% #91 1,868 0 2
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1994 5–9 35.7% #192 1,772 0 2
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Darren Cahill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 8 7 15 53.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 12 10 22 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1991 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 6 1 7 85.7%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 65 52 117 55.6% 29 23 52 55.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 17 19 36 47.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 34/35 of Darren Cahill's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Darren Cahill
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 20/21 4.1 2.9 59.5% 73.6% 52.5% 55.6% 42.2% 65.0% 41.0%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% 1994 14/14 3.3 3.1 59.2% 68.9% 47.3% 52.8% 43.8% 60.2% 37.6%
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2% — 34/248 3.8 3.0 59.4% 71.7% 50.4% 54.4% 42.9% 63.0% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Darren Cahill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1503 101.4 — — — — — — +36 33.3% -0.78 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 100.2 +0.41
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1985 1579 119.7 — — — — -42 +39 -36 44.4% -0.25 6–1 (86%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 +1.37
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 1986 1549 104.9 — — — — -32 +66 -4 43.3% -0.53 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +1.42
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1987 1660 131.0 — — — — -40 +62 -197 48.4% -0.23 7–6 (54%) 7–7 (50%) 102.4 +1.36
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1988 1769 143.6 — — — — -66 -3 -129 55.3% +0.54 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) 101.9 -1.01
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1989 1756 135.5 — — — — -3 +10 -122 51.7% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 11–7 (61%) 107.4 +0.31
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1990 1820 148.2 — — — — -2 — -130 53.3% +0.28 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 95.9 -2.15
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1991 1869 142.3 +3.05 +1.72 1.173 52.8% +4 — — 62.5% +0.71 7–2 (78%) 4–4 (50%) 106.6 +0.06
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 1994 1772 133.1 -0.61 +1.03 0.946 49.2% +15 — — 41.7% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 95.6 -1.33
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1889 142.3 +1.54 +1.44 1.072 51.3% -20 +30 -89 51.1% +0.11 51–38 (57%) 50–51 (50%) 106.4 +0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.