H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ronald Agenor vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-0
Ronald Agenor holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1994 Roland Garros second round 6-7(4) 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 14-12.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-7(4) 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 14-12 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ronald Agenor | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |