H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Diego Perez H2H: 1-1

Ronald Agenor and Diego Perez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1993 Kuala Lumpur (1) round of 32 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Diego Perez
URU Age 64 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ronald Agenor #132 7-5 6-0 Diego Perez #128 Match data Jan 7, 1993* R32 Kuala Lumpur (1) ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Diego Perez #53 6-2 6-4 Ronald Agenor #60 Match data Oct 10, 1985* R32 Toulouse ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Diego Perez #1,263 #27 389 1,824 195 213 47.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Diego Perez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,486 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% #211 1,473 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1981 16–15 51.6% #94 1,652 0 0
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1982 11–16 40.7% #100 1,657 0 0
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1983 19–14 57.6% #51 1,728 0 0
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1984 15–16 48.4% #52 1,659 0 0
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1985 30–21 58.8% #55 1,763 0 1
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1986 30–25 54.5% #61 1,692 0 1
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1987 15–19 44.1% #116 1,668 0 1
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1988 12–17 41.4% #142 1,608 0 1
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1989 17–17 50.0% #112 1,651 0 1
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1990 12–18 40.0% #132 1,594 0 1
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 1991 5–9 35.7% #176 1,572 0 1
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 1992 11–10 52.4% #128 1,619 0 1
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 1993 2–13 13.3% #253 1,511 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #661 1,498 0 1
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Diego Perez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 11 15 26 42.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 4 2 6 66.7% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 28 16 44 63.6% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 22 18 40 55.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1988 6 8 14 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 15 13 28 53.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 32 49 81 39.5% 162 156 318 50.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 44/51 of Diego Perez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Diego Perez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% 1991 10/14 2.5 1.6 68.2% 64.4% 54.5% 54.3% 44.9% 61.3% 42.0%
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% 1992 20/21 3.0 2.4 60.0% 63.8% 50.4% 52.5% 45.3% 58.6% 43.7%
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% 1993 13/15 1.8 3.7 58.0% 60.3% 44.7% 49.0% 31.2% 53.0% 36.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 1/1 0.0 3.0 63.0% 47.1% 43.3% 60.0% 28.6% 45.7% 42.9%
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2% — 44/408 2.5 2.6 61.4% 62.5% 49.5% 52.0% 40.7% 57.3% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Diego Perez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1486 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1473 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.11
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1981 1652 145.1 — — — — — +48 — 56.3% +0.03 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 98.6 -0.45
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 1982 1658 141.1 — — — — — +31 — 47.8% -0.18 4–9 (31%) 4–6 (40%) 94.1 -0.92
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1983 1728 141.3 — — — — -150 +8 — 54.1% +0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 -0.26
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1984 1659 138.8 — — — — -149 +78 — 52.0% +0.03 2–8 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 90.7 -0.21
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1985 1763 138.5 — — — — -270 +48 — 53.9% +0.37 9–2 (82%) 3–6 (33%) 105.7 +0.70
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1986 1693 137.4 — — — — -108 +6 — 51.6% +0.21 9–7 (56%) 5–9 (36%) 98.5 +0.43
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1987 1669 132.4 — — — — -52 -12 — 44.7% -0.31 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 99.3 -2.18
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 1988 1609 125.1 — — — — -4 0 — 45.3% -0.41 8–9 (47%) 4–6 (40%) 97.8 -0.14
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 1989 1651 135.0 — — — — -57 +26 — 50.0% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) 99.9 -1.06
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 1990 1594 127.7 — — — — -38 +95 — 42.3% -0.83 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.8 -0.79
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 1991 1573 118.5 -0.06 +0.92 1.086 51.0% -20 +66 — 41.7% -0.36 0–3 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.2 +0.11
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 1992 1619 123.6 -1.94 +2.72 1.058 51.0% -104 +109 — 50.9% +0.25 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.51
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 1993 1511 108.3 -3.89 -1.43 0.785 45.0% -47 +102 — 29.3% -1.93 0–6 (0%) 2–0 — -0.34
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1498 98.3 +1.21 -2.79 0.789 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1825 141.5 -2.02 +0.96 0.967 49.1% -84 +41 — 48.7% -0.11 58–74 (44%) 41–56 (42%) 92.5 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.