H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ronald Agenor vs Franco Davin H2H: 3-1
Ronald Agenor holds a 3–1 lead over Franco Davin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ronald Agenor leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1990 Hilversum third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1990* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-3 6-1 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| May 10, 1990* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Franco Davin | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1989* | Athens | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1988* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-2 6-4 | Franco Davin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ronald Agenor | Franco Davin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |