H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ronald Agenor vs Guillermo Vilas H2H: 1-2
Guillermo Vilas holds a 2–1 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1988 Kitzbuhel second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 73
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1988* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Vilas | 6-4 6-2 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1986* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Vilas | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1985* | Marbella | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-0 6-1 | Guillermo Vilas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Guillermo Vilas | #1,186 | #2 | 47 | 2,338 | 898 | 282 | 76.1% | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 55 | 63 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ronald Agenor | Guillermo Vilas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #31 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 88–22 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,171 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 87–18 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 0 | 13 |
| 23 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 82–20 | 80.4% | #6 | 2,079 | 0 | 19 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 128–15 | 89.5% | #2 | 2,303 | 2 | 35 |
| 25 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 61–8 | 88.4% | #3 | 2,216 | 3 | 42 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 70–21 | 76.9% | #6 | 2,087 | 4 | 46 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 67–17 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,050 | 4 | 50 |
| 28 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #6 | 2,035 | 4 | 53 |
| 29 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 70–16 | 81.4% | #4 | 2,014 | 4 | 60 |
| 30 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 51–17 | 75.0% | #11 | 1,947 | 4 | 63 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,791 | 4 | 63 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,767 | 4 | 63 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,760 | 4 | 63 |
| 34 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #71 | 1,717 | 4 | 63 |
| 35 | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #126 | 1,630 | 4 | 63 |
| 36 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #408 | 1,601 | 4 | 63 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,577 | 4 | 63 |