H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ronald Agenor vs Jim Courier H2H: 0-1
Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1993 Wimbledon second round 7-5 6-1 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jim Courier | 7-5 6-1 7-6(1) | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ronald Agenor | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 30 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |