H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 1-3

Jimmy Connors holds a 3–1 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jimmy Connors leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1991 Paris Masters second round 5-7 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 30, 1991* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Jimmy Connors #47 5-7 6-4 6-2 Ronald Agenor #71 Match data
May 31, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jimmy Connors #324 6-4 6-2 3-6 0-6 6-4 Ronald Agenor #28 Match data
Oct 4, 1990* Toulouse ATP 250 R32 Hard Ronald Agenor #30 6-4 6-4 Jimmy Connors #125 Match data
Aug 20, 1986* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jimmy Connors #6 6-1 7-5 Ronald Agenor #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,895 215 251 46.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1988 24–17 58.5% #28 1,776 0 0 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,768 0 1 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,815 0 3 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,600 0 3 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,578 0 3 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,585 0 3 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 1996 0–4 0.0% #326 1,528 0 3 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,533 0 3 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,522 0 3 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109