H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Jordi Burillo H2H: 2-1

Ronald Agenor holds a 2–1 lead over Jordi Burillo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jordi Burillo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1994 Milan round of 32 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Jordi Burillo
ESP Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ronald Agenor #55 6-1 6-0 Jordi Burillo #67 Match data Feb 10, 1994* R32 Milan ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Ronald Agenor #58 6-2 6-4 Jordi Burillo #56 Match data Jan 6, 1994* R32 Qatar Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jordi Burillo #107 6-4 6-4 Ronald Agenor #101 Match data Jun 12, 1993* SF Florence ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jordi Burillo #1,377 #43 887 1,728 91 129 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Jordi Burillo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #497 1,487 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1992 2–7 22.2% #157 1,484 0 0
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1993 18–17 51.4% #56 1,610 0 1
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1994 20–30 40.0% #122 1,585 0 1
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1995 18–22 45.0% #45 1,625 0 1
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1996 14–21 40.0% #99 1,585 0 1
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1997 8–10 44.4% #90 1,597 0 1
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1998 11–21 34.4% #148 1,567 0 1
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Jordi Burillo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 5 10 15 33.3% 13 18 31 41.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 2 6 8 25.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 11 12 23 47.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 15 39 54 27.8% 70 79 149 47.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Jordi Burillo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1487 100.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1992 1485 124.2 +0.65 -2.93 0.834 46.6% — +45 — 31.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -0.58
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 1993 1611 133.5 -1.28 +2.37 1.069 51.2% -106 +63 — 51.3% +0.01 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 98.4 -0.09
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1994 1586 128.5 -1.91 -0.14 0.927 48.5% -89 +49 +49 42.1% -0.58 4–8 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.8 +0.41
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1995 1625 133.5 +0.07 +0.28 1.018 50.1% -144 +92 -12 46.6% -0.04 8–12 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 98.6 +1.27
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1996 1585 134.5 -2.30 -0.37 0.881 47.8% -120 +113 — 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 103.5 -1.41
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1997 1598 128.1 -0.43 -1.19 0.935 48.7% — +108 — 48.8% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.3 +1.03
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1998 1567 127.8 -0.01 -1.70 0.957 48.9% -88 +96 +55 40.3% -0.60 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.6 -0.25
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1729 136.7 -1.03 -0.13 0.957 49.1% -106 +81 +37 44.2% -0.36 30–45 (40%) 28–40 (41%) 97.1 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.