H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Jose Francisco Altur H2H: 2-0

Ronald Agenor holds a 2–0 lead over Jose Francisco Altur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ronald Agenor leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1991 Genova round of 32 6-3 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Jose Francisco Altur
ESP Age 58 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ronald Agenor #28 6-3 2-6 6-4 Jose Francisco Altur #118 Match data Jun 20, 1991* R32 Genova ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Ronald Agenor #71 7-5 6-3 Jose Francisco Altur #112 Match data Jun 22, 1990* R16 Genova ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jose Francisco Altur #674 #88 398 1,588 31 66 32.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Jose Francisco Altur
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1989 6–3 66.7% #130 1,567 0 1
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1990 5–15 25.0% #112 1,493 0 1
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1991 2–13 13.3% #179 1,390 0 1
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1992 4–11 26.7% #140 1,398 0 1
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1993 10–16 38.5% #118 1,449 0 1
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1994 3–7 30.0% #206 1,459 0 1
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1995 1–1 50.0% #521 1,466 0 1
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Jose Francisco Altur
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 4 11 15 26.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 2 15 17 11.8% 26 41 67 38.8% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 60/68 of Jose Francisco Altur's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Jose Francisco Altur
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 12/15 4.1 3.3 66.5% 65.0% 46.7% 47.6% 29.2% 58.6% 34.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 14/15 3.2 2.2 66.1% 65.4% 43.8% 54.8% 31.8% 58.0% 37.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 24/26 2.0 2.5 66.8% 64.3% 44.5% 50.9% 38.9% 58.0% 37.2%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% 1994 8/10 2.6 3.6 62.1% 63.2% 48.3% 60.4% 50.3% 57.4% 32.9%
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% 1995 2/2 2.5 8.5 71.0% 61.1% 33.2% 46.9% 58.1% 53.0% 50.7%
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2% — 60/97 2.8 3.0 66.1% 64.5% 44.9% 52.3% 37.5% 57.9% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Jose Francisco Altur
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1989 1568 110.6 — — — — -39 +45 — 57.1% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +1.05
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1990 1494 112.3 — — — — +13 +68 — 33.3% -1.08 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 96.0 +0.79
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1991 1391 105.7 -1.76 -1.69 0.838 46.4% +44 +126 — 24.4% -1.51 1–5 (17%) 3–3 (50%) 98.2 +0.99
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1992 1398 114.2 -1.55 -2.29 0.885 47.9% +29 +114 — 30.3% -1.24 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.1 +0.82
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1993 1449 122.5 -1.68 -1.32 0.886 47.7% -41 +111 — 35.9% -0.77 7–2 (78%) 2–6 (25%) 105.2 +1.04
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 1994 1460 100.8 -1.43 -3.36 0.772 45.9% — +110 — 29.2% -1.71 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.01
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 1995 1467 104.4 -0.08 +0.47 1.078 51.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.27
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1588 116.7 -1.58 -1.83 0.868 47.4% +10 +97 — 34.2% -1.01 17–15 (53%) 12–20 (38%) 102.9 +5.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.