H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Julio Goes H2H: 1-0

Ronald Agenor holds a 1–0 lead over Julio Goes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1986 Palermo round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Julio Goes
BRA Age 70 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ronald Agenor #66 6-2 6-3 Julio Goes #177 Match data Oct 2, 1986* R32 Palermo ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Julio Goes #1,115 #68 29 1,522 12 38 24.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Julio Goes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1980 1–2 33.3% #241 1,498 0 0
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1982 3–12 20.0% #100 1,433 0 0
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1983 4–7 36.4% #117 1,460 0 0
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1984 0–3 0.0% #177 1,430 0 0
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 1985 1–2 33.3% #96 1,421 0 0
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 1986 1–6 14.3% #213 1,409 0 0
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 1987 2–3 40.0% #165 1,423 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #286 1,417 0 0
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 1989 0–1 0.0% #458 1,403 0 0
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Julio Goes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 7 11 18 38.9% 3 21 24 12.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Julio Goes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.70 1980 1498 97.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.35
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.13 1981 1491 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.22 1982 1433 102.8 — — — — +111 +31 +53 22.9% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +1.19
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) — -0.10 1983 1460 110.9 — — — — +98 -18 — 40.7% -0.63 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — +1.09
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.63 1984 1430 114.8 — — — — — -7 — 28.6% -0.57 0–1 0–2 — +0.15
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.66 1985 1422 97.2 — — — — — -25 — 33.3% -1.00 — 1–0 — +0.58
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.29 1986 1410 110.2 — — — — +131 -17 — 18.8% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 1987 1423 97.7 — — — — +114 — — 45.5% -0.73 0–1 — — +0.54
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1417 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.03
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 1989 1403 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1522 107.9 — — — — +111 +4 +53 29.9% -1.42 3–7 (30%) 4–8 (33%) 96.0 +7.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.