H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Kelly Evernden H2H: 2-0

Ronald Agenor holds a 2–0 lead over Kelly Evernden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ronald Agenor leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1989 Los Angeles Open round of 32 7-6 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Kelly Evernden
NZL Age 64 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ronald Agenor #41 7-6 4-6 6-2 Kelly Evernden #65 Match data Sep 21, 1989* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Ronald Agenor #26 6-1 3-6 6-3 3-6 6-1 Kelly Evernden #84 Match data Aug 31, 1988* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kelly Evernden #1,218 #31 535 1,853 122 130 48.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Kelly Evernden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1980 1–1 50.0% #403 1,505 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% #576 1,494 0 0
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1985 17–11 60.7% #86 1,668 0 0
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1986 2–12 14.3% #289 1,542 0 0
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1987 29–18 61.7% #36 1,793 0 2
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1988 16–24 40.0% #119 1,609 0 2
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1989 30–18 62.5% #38 1,708 0 3
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1990 15–23 39.5% #97 1,615 0 3
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 1991 4–13 23.5% #193 1,501 0 3
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 1992 5–5 50.0% #207 1,552 0 3
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 1993 2–2 50.0% #447 1,574 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,564 0 3
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Kelly Evernden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1987 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1988 6 14 20 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 19 11 30 63.3% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 11 16 27 40.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 67 79 146 45.9% 4 9 13 30.8% 32 25 57 56.1% 19 17 36 52.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Kelly Evernden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 94.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — +0.35
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 1982 1506 99.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.46
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1983 1495 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.06
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1985 1669 127.8 — — — — -42 — -11 57.3% +0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–9 (25%) 99.0 +2.77
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1986 1542 107.0 — — — — +14 — +10 29.7% -1.08 0–5 (0%) 3–6 (33%) 92.1 +0.12
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1987 1794 142.6 — — — — -81 — +54 56.1% +0.41 11–2 (85%) 10–8 (56%) 113.4 -1.42
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 1988 1610 122.6 — — — — -6 -120 +142 47.2% -0.39 4–12 (25%) 12–10 (55%) 94.1 +1.86
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 1989 1708 134.2 — — — — +12 — +9 59.2% +0.45 11–10 (52%) 11–10 (52%) 98.9 +3.49
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 1990 1616 119.1 — — — — +19 — +78 39.8% -0.81 7–8 (47%) 6–8 (43%) 96.2 +1.76
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 1991 1502 115.1 — — — — +23 -16 +183 27.9% -1.28 1–4 (20%) 2–7 (22%) 93.7 +0.13
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 1992 1553 117.3 — — — — +8 — — 54.5% +0.18 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.03
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 1993 1575 114.3 — — — — -5 — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1565 103.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.07
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1853 131.7 — — — — -8 -55 +55 49.3% -0.08 42–51 (45%) 51–63 (45%) 94.5 +3.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.