H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 0-1

Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1988 Seoul Olympics first round 3-6 6-3 6-2 2-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Leonardo Lavalle
MEX Age 59 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Lavalle #145 3-6 6-3 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Ronald Agenor #26 Match data Sep 23, 1988* R64 Seoul Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Leonardo Lavalle #968 #51 483 1,728 64 98 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Leonardo Lavalle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1985 4–5 44.4% #87 1,558 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1986 10–17 37.0% #105 1,588 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1987 2–9 18.2% #224 1,531 0 0
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1988 10–8 55.6% #64 1,654 0 0
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1989 11–15 42.3% #132 1,649 0 0
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1990 5–9 35.7% #183 1,596 0 0
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1991 5–3 62.5% #133 1,658 0 1
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1992 10–16 38.5% #99 1,645 0 1
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1993 4–9 30.8% #309 1,596 0 1
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1994 0–2 0.0% #213 1,568 0 1
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1995 1–2 33.3% #362 1,565 0 1
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1996 1–1 50.0% #313 1,570 0 1
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 1997 0–1 0.0% #439 1,561 0 1
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 1998 1–1 50.0% #400 1,569 0 1
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Leonardo Lavalle
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 3 8 11 27.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1988 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 6 11 17 35.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 30 45 75 40.0% 22 29 51 43.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 11 14 25 44.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 45/57 of Leonardo Lavalle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Leonardo Lavalle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 5/8 8.4 1.8 69.1% 72.3% 55.8% 68.2% 35.6% 67.3% 33.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 22/26 4.2 3.3 62.6% 68.3% 49.6% 50.5% 37.5% 61.5% 35.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 10/13 3.3 4.3 58.3% 63.5% 43.6% 51.7% 46.9% 54.7% 35.9%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% 1994 2/2 2.5 2.5 68.5% 56.6% 36.0% 33.9% 49.0% 50.2% 39.1%
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% 1995 2/3 4.0 7.5 51.2% 72.1% 40.7% 43.8% 45.0% 56.9% 41.5%
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% 1996 1/2 5.0 4.0 62.5% 61.8% 30.3% 68.8% 42.9% 50.0% 41.3%
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% 1997 1/1 7.0 5.0 59.5% 66.7% 46.9% 78.6% 60.0% 58.7% 33.7%
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% 1998 2/2 1.5 4.0 69.1% 66.0% 50.7% 61.3% 31.0% 61.0% 41.1%
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2% — 45/162 4.3 3.6 62.3% 67.1% 47.5% 53.2% 40.6% 59.6% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Leonardo Lavalle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1558 126.7 — — — — +14 -9 — 44.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1588 127.2 — — — — 0 -11 — 37.5% -1.03 7–5 (58%) 5–2 (71%) 106.3 -1.10
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1987 1531 120.6 — — — — +31 +34 — 29.6% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.54
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 1988 1654 137.9 — — — — +26 -94 — 41.5% -0.51 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 105.5 -0.81
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1989 1649 126.6 — — — — +31 -56 — 47.0% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.7 -0.27
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1990 1596 107.2 — — — — +43 -11 — 42.4% -0.52 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.85
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1991 1658 122.7 +0.15 -1.21 1.022 50.1% +34 — — 50.0% -0.05 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 -0.14
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1992 1646 122.6 -0.34 -1.80 0.915 48.1% -19 -9 -164 45.7% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 -0.27
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1993 1596 111.1 -2.52 -2.49 0.792 45.9% +5 -12 — 25.8% -1.45 4–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.61
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 1994 1568 101.6 -2.71 -1.42 0.785 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 1995 1566 110.6 +3.66 +0.68 0.964 49.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 1–0 — — -0.25
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 1996 1570 108.2 +1.19 -1.53 0.827 46.0% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.04
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 1997 1562 106.7 +1.45 -0.38 0.815 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 1998 1570 108.2 +2.32 -0.20 1.053 50.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.06
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1729 132.9 -0.51 -1.65 0.890 47.8% +14 -24 -164 40.7% -0.61 28–26 (52%) 24–29 (45%) 102.3 -2.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.