H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ronald Agenor vs Libor Pimek H2H: 0-1
Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1986 Rome fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Libor Pimek | 6-1 6-2 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ronald Agenor | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |