H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Mark Kratzmann H2H: 0-1

Mark Kratzmann holds a 1–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Kratzmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Kratzmann won the 1990 Miami Open round of 32 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mark Kratzmann
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Kratzmann #64 7-6 7-5 Ronald Agenor #37 Match data Mar 19, 1990* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mark Kratzmann #1,147 #50 557 1,751 60 96 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Mark Kratzmann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 1–3 25.0% #616 1,474 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1984 2–6 25.0% #246 1,477 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1985 4–3 57.1% #209 1,534 0 0
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1986 5–10 33.3% #142 1,545 0 0
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% #182 1,543 0 0
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1988 3–6 33.3% #150 1,540 0 0
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1989 11–14 44.0% #122 1,604 0 0
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1990 21–23 47.7% #75 1,623 0 0
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1991 5–13 27.8% #208 1,539 0 0
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1992 0–1 0.0% #572 1,528 0 0
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Mark Kratzmann
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1991 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 27 52 79 34.2% 1 9 10 10.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 16/19 of Mark Kratzmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Mark Kratzmann
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 15/18 3.5 3.5 52.8% 71.2% 51.8% 52.2% 32.8% 62.0% 32.4%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% 1992 1/1 3.0 5.0 61.4% 69.4% 43.6% 50.0% 33.3% 59.4% 31.9%
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Mark Kratzmann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1454 97.6 — — — — — — +22 30.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.29
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1475 108.3 — — — — — — +37 41.7% -0.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1477 107.1 — — — — — — +37 33.3% -0.83 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.06
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1985 1535 111.3 — — — — -40 — +64 53.3% +0.13 1–0 1–1 — +0.60
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 1986 1546 125.6 — — — — -44 -64 +92 42.6% -0.30 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.02
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 1987 1543 116.1 — — — — -70 -95 +168 40.7% -0.76 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +0.07
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1988 1541 105.8 — — — — -52 — — 33.3% -0.96 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.35
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1989 1605 130.8 — — — — -25 — +108 47.2% -0.24 3–8 (27%) 11–7 (61%) 101.0 -1.10
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 1990 1624 128.1 — — — — +17 — +93 44.6% -0.55 11–7 (61%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 -0.25
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 1991 1539 113.9 -0.13 -3.85 0.855 47.8% +3 — +151 35.4% -0.92 3–6 (33%) 6–8 (43%) 95.6 +0.30
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 1992 1529 103.1 -0.28 -0.21 0.785 46.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.07
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1752 126.5 -0.14 -3.62 0.850 47.7% -15 -77 +101 41.8% -0.59 25–36 (41%) 37–38 (49%) 99.7 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.