H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Mats Wilander H2H: 1-3

Mats Wilander holds a 3–1 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1989 Monte Carlo quarterfinal 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 1989* Monte Carlo ATP 250 QF Clay Mats Wilander #2 6-3 7-6 Ronald Agenor #24 Match data
Jun 1, 1988* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mats Wilander #3 6-1 7-6 6-3 Ronald Agenor #30 Match data
May 14, 1988* Rome Masters 1000 R16 Clay Ronald Agenor #45 6-3 7-5 Mats Wilander #2 Match data
Apr 26, 1986* Monte Carlo ATP 250 QF Clay Mats Wilander #3 6-4 6-1 Ronald Agenor #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,895 215 251 46.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1988 24–17 58.5% #28 1,776 0 0 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,768 0 1 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,815 0 3 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,600 0 3 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,578 0 3 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,585 0 3 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 1996 0–4 0.0% #326 1,528 0 3 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,522 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —