H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ronald Agenor vs Pat Cash H2H: 1-0
Ronald Agenor holds a 1–0 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1991 Birmingham fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1991* | Birmingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ronald Agenor | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Pat Cash | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ronald Agenor | Pat Cash | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |