H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Todd Witsken H2H: 0-1

Todd Witsken holds a 1–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Witsken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Witsken won the 1992 Memphis round of 64 2-6 7-6(8) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Todd Witsken
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Witsken #107 2-6 7-6(8) 7-6(3) Ronald Agenor #74 Match data Feb 12, 1992* R64 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Todd Witsken #1,205 #43 568 1,782 115 135 46.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Todd Witsken
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1983 1–2 33.3% #358 1,496 0 0
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% #676 1,481 0 0
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1985 0–2 0.0% #220 1,462 0 0
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1986 13–15 46.4% #55 1,650 0 0
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1987 10–16 38.5% #158 1,627 0 0
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1988 17–16 51.5% #67 1,692 0 0
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1989 21–16 56.8% #54 1,716 0 0
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1990 23–20 53.5% #58 1,772 0 0
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1991 12–16 42.9% #110 1,678 0 0
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1992 14–18 43.8% #104 1,637 0 0
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 1993 4–10 28.6% #275 1,554 0 0
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Todd Witsken
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1989 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1990 15 10 25 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 81 77 158 51.3% 17 31 48 35.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 11 13 24 45.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 63/74 of Todd Witsken's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Todd Witsken
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% 1991 22/28 1.6 2.3 64.3% 62.4% 48.5% 46.3% 40.7% 57.3% 39.1%
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% 1992 29/32 3.3 3.9 58.4% 67.1% 49.2% 47.5% 45.4% 59.4% 39.4%
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% 1993 12/14 2.2 3.8 58.1% 67.0% 43.8% 50.1% 37.2% 56.8% 33.9%
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2% — 63/250 2.5 3.3 60.4% 65.4% 47.9% 47.6% 42.2% 58.2% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Todd Witsken
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1496 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.16
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1983 1497 107.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.83 — 2–0 — -0.42
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.06 1984 1482 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.17
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.67 1985 1463 102.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.17 1986 1651 139.5 — — — — +46 -167 -124 48.1% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.21
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.17 1987 1628 134.3 — — — — +50 -143 — 42.9% -0.46 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.86
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.70 1988 1692 143.0 — — — — +22 -163 — 51.2% +0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.42
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.13 1989 1717 135.0 — — — — +32 -154 -225 54.3% +0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.60
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.22 1990 1773 139.2 — — — — +47 -218 — 51.9% -0.33 7–7 (50%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.18
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) — -0.10 1991 1679 135.7 -1.92 -0.05 0.916 48.4% +47 -78 -140 42.7% -0.36 6–5 (55%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.73
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.63 1992 1637 124.6 -1.67 +0.77 0.969 49.2% +16 +3 -110 44.9% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.58
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.66 1993 1554 114.5 -2.93 -2.69 0.785 45.7% +99 +12 — 36.8% -1.16 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.36
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1782 140.8 -2.00 -0.18 0.914 48.2% +40 -116 -145 46.9% -0.33 37–40 (48%) 40–33 (55%) 103.8 -2.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.