H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-0

Ronald Agenor holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 2001 Chennai round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ronald Agenor #137 6-3 6-2 Tomas Zib #117 Match data Jan 4, 2001* R32 Chennai ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Tomas Zib
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Tomas Zib
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's and 123/134 of Tomas Zib's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ronald Agenor Tomas Zib
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8%
26 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8% 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5%
28 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2% 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6%
29 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5% 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9%
30 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9% 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1%
31 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1% 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3%
33 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2% — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Tomas Zib
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 99.1 +0.15
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.93
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 -0.23
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) 100.8 +0.40
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 93.7 -0.86
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.