H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo vs A. Voinea H2H: 0-1
A. Voinea holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, A. Voinea leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, A. Voinea won the 2001 Bucharest fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2001* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | A. Voinea | 6-3 6-2 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A. Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | A. Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |